Jump to Article

Jump to Amendment

Presidential Terms

Section 1. The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin. Section 2. The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year, and such meeting shall begin at noon on the 3d day of January, unless they shall by law appoint a different day. Section 3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified. Section 4. The Congress may by law provide for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the House of Representatives may choose a President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them, and for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the Senate may choose a Vice President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them. Section 5. Sections 1 and 2 shall take effect on the 15th day of October following the ratification of this article. Section 6. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission.
amendment XX
Section
1
Clause
1
Related Citations

Discussing the odd power in Section 4 of the Twentieth Amendment to provide substitute candidates for dead candidates. Arguing that the Section makes clear that the proper mechanism for resolving any disputes arising under this section is legislation. Examining the background behind Section 4 and how Congress proactively responded to a purely hypothetical problem.

Arguing that, at the time of the Founding, the office of the Vice President was an afterthought of the Constitutional Convention. Providing context about how the vice presidency was viewed between 1787 and 1804.

Arguing that the history of the vice presidency offers an example of how constitutional institutions change in ways different from the way originalists suggest they should. Contending that the constitutional character of the Vice President’s Office has been transformed from the Founders’ original intentions and expectations. Describing the vice presidency as originally conceived and the subsequent constitutional changes that transformed it.

Discusses the Twentieth Amendment’s text, legislative history, and original meaning as expressed by its sponsors. Evaluating the challenges to lame-duck lawmaking to conclude that the Twentieth Amendment does not bar it.

Analyzing arguments that lame-duck lawmaking is, or should be, impermissible. Arguing that the Framers of the Twentieth Amendment also had concerns but that they sought to prevent Congress from doing anything during a lame-duck session. Tracing the history and context underlying the ratification of the Twentieth Amendment from the Founding.

Arguing that the constitutional provisions concerning presidential succession do not cover all possible contingencies. Arguing that the Twentieth Amendment’s spirit is best followed by understanding its words “President elect” to mean the person designated by the people as de facto President elect (rather than waiting for the electoral college vote).

Arguing that the Court’s decision in Seminole Tribe v. Florida, though an Eleventh Amendment case, could breathe new life into the interpretation of the Twentieth Amendment. Analyzing primary resources from the time of ratification to conclude that the purpose of the Amendment was to abolish lame-duck sessions of Congress. 

Interactive Constitution: Feedback Form

Have we missed an article? Please let us know of any additional scholarship that should be included in the Interactive Constitution.